[129272] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Comcast enables 6to4 relays
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Aug 31 13:13:28 2010
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:02:56 CDT."
<4C7D35C0.6040106@brightok.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:12:45 -0400
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1283274765_4240P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:02:56 CDT, Jack Bates said:
> 6to4 doesn't suffer the same issues. Primarily because RFC1918
> addressing can't be used in 6to4. This means that at a minimum, the
> router has to participate or the host behind it must be manually
> configured with a 6to4 address (for the proto 41 pass through to work).
> Neither is an automatic traversal of the router's policies without user
> knowledge.
I'm sure that somewhere, somebody has managed to configure their gear
such that one of those two things can happen without user knowledge. :)
--==_Exmh_1283274765_4240P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFMfTgNcC3lWbTT17ARAnpKAJsHtf9f3evCS7UTdVSndINkJD9xMgCdGMnY
rwjL3X2uLZnpA+tk9XP41ws=
=ch0G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1283274765_4240P--
