[129236] in North American Network Operators' Group
Life experience: Cisco ASR9000 vs. Juniper MX960
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason Lixfeld)
Mon Aug 30 14:28:05 2010
From: Jason Lixfeld <jason@lixfeld.ca>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:27:55 -0400
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I'm looking for feedback on Cisco's ASR9000 vs. Juniper MX960. We're =
evaluating the two and are in the process of testing these two platforms =
and I'd like to try to have a leg up on testing if there are any gotchas =
that have crept up in the real world.
What we're looking for information on are problems that have arisen in =
these areas:
- Interface linerate issues (oversubscription, etc)
- Backplane/slot capacity issues (oversubscription, etc)
- Supervisor/RE switchover
- DC PDUs and power redundancy
- BGP4/MP-BGP
- IPv6
- L2VPN
- L3VPN
- VPLS
- LDP
- RSVP
- MPLS-TE
- MPLS-FRR
- OSPF
- ISIS
- In the case of Juniper, interoperability with Cisco for MPLS and =
associated protocols and features.
- Anything else you'd like to mention, good or bad.
If anyone is interested, I'll compile the results and provide them to =
whomever.
Thanks in advance.=
