[129139] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Did your BGP crash today?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Aug 27 16:57:58 2010
To: Clay Fiske <clay@bloomcounty.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:43:39 PDT."
<F2F1BE83-8A86-426A-9BB1-121EB710F78A@bloomcounty.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:57:17 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1282942637_4510P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:43:39 PDT, Clay Fiske said:
> If -everyone- dropped the session on a bad attribute, it likely wouldn't
> make it far enough into the wild to cause these problems in the first
> place.
That works fine for malformed attributes. It blows chunks for legally formed
but unknown attributes - how would you ever deploy a new attribute?
--==_Exmh_1282942637_4510P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFMeCatcC3lWbTT17ARApqPAKCWqD0ggj9n3onCEegwZ/AAfQJyrwCggsge
DonUFv6oz2VQNR1AvFrXwmg=
=NPAc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1282942637_4510P--
