[129127] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Did your BGP crash today?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thomas Mangin)
Fri Aug 27 15:11:10 2010

From: Thomas Mangin <thomas.mangin@exa-networks.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4C780BE6.5050809@Janoszka.pl>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:10:54 +0100
To: Grzegorz Janoszka <Grzegorz@Janoszka.pl>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On 27 Aug 2010, at 20:03, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:

> On 27-08-10 20:41, Thomas Mangin wrote:
>>> I think most of the impact was limited to Europe, especially =
Amsterdam area.
>> Yes, It had an effect on ISPs which are connected to RIS. =
http://www.ripe.net/ris/
>> AFAIK this mean ASes at LINX and AMS-IX . The LINX graph shows a =
similar (but smaller) dip of 50-60 GB.
>=20
> Not only. We don't peer with RIS, but about 8-10 our peers announce to =
us RIS. The nasty update we got from completely different AS, not RIS.
> You may just check whether you see AS12654 - it is RIS.

Yes, the BGP message had a transitive attribute - sorry if I was not =
clear.
That said, you may want to ask why you are getting RIS routes if you are =
not peering with them directly :p

RIS is peering world wide ( http://www.ripe.net/ris/docs/peering.html ) =
but the mail was only sent to linx-ops and tech-l, so the announcement =
may have been limited to europe (for all I know).

Thomas



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post