[129035] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for suggestions for an internet content filteringappliance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Aug 23 16:15:19 2010
To: khatfield@socllc.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:46:59 -0000."
<99222389-1282592820-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1041460579-@bda903.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:14:39 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1282594479_4282P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:46:59 -0000, khatfield@socllc.net said:
> This would give you some advantages:
> 1) Content caching - increasing speeds for users while decreasing your overall bandwidth utilization.
Does anybody have any real-world stats on what size local Squid/whatever cache
they're using and what % of bandwidth savings they're seeing? (Bonus points if
you've identified specific things it helps, like Patch Tuesday or whatever).
Might be interesting to see what impact a local Akamai node has on your own
caching savings too...
--==_Exmh_1282594479_4282P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFMctavcC3lWbTT17ARAsY+AJ9ZOJ48N/dgUPLwfES5prIZWbAsBACg/IZh
hX+shY0u9GavHKCu63nB+ys=
=225C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1282594479_4282P--
