[128998] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Other NOGs around the world?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Smith)
Sun Aug 22 17:16:02 2010
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 06:42:04 +0930
From: Mark Smith <nanog@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org>
To: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100822195153.GD776@hezmatt.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 05:51:53 +1000
Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:42:03AM +1000, Karl Auer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 10:17 -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> > > On Aug 22, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Rogelio wrote:
> > > > What other "network operator groups" are there around the world (besides NANOG)?
> >
> > AusNOG. At a bit of a low S:N right now.
> >
> > We have been leading up to a Federal election, with two big tech issues
> > involved - a new national broadband network and Internet censorship.
> > These two topics have rather dominated discussions of late.
>
> Politics on an operational list? NEVAH!
>
Fighting off censorship means not having to find rack space and cooling
for large amounts of gear, and trying to engineer to have gobs of
bandwidth go through latency inducing single points of failure :-)
Regards,
Mark.
