[128893] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: end-user ipv6 deployment and concerns about privacy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joakim Aronius)
Thu Aug 19 13:58:44 2010
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:58:32 +0200
From: Joakim Aronius <joakim@aronius.com>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C6D606B.1020403@bogus.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
* Joel Jaeggli (joelja@bogus.com) wrote:
>
> manual configuration of ip address name mappings seems like a rather low
> priority for the average home user...
>
> I don't expect that will be a big activity in the future either, more
> devices means less manual intervention not more.
>
Ok, ok, so that argument sucked. I guess I'm still stuck in the IPv4 mindset and have not yet grasped the full blessing of IPv6, zeroconf etc. etc.
Anyway, constantly changing prefixes for home users still seem like begging for trouble. (Could be a service though, as mentioned, but on the other hand I expect a fair number of anonymity services to arise so charging for it might be tough.)
Cheers,
/Joakim