[128807] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Lightly used IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan White)
Mon Aug 16 14:02:49 2010
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:01:43 -0500
From: Dan White <dwhite@olp.net>
To: John Springer <springer@inlandnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100816094302.V2768@mail.inlandnet.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 16/08/10 09:47 -0700, John Springer wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Aug 2010, Frank Bulk wrote:
>
>> This week I was told by my sales person at Red Condor that I'm the only one
>> of his customers that is asking for IPv6. He sounded annoyed and it seemed
>> like he was trying to make me feel bad for being the "only oddball" pushing
>> the IPv6 feature requirement.
>
> FWIW, I asked the same question. My guy was polite, but w/o info.
>
> John Springer
Hi Frank,
I was actually told that there was some demand for it, and that they were
targeting 2011 for support, which was acknowledged when I brought it up
again in a difference conference call.
I'll note that they just got bought out, which may change their priorities,
for better or worse.
--
Dan White
