[128801] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Lightly used IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Mon Aug 16 11:00:45 2010
From: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
To: Joe Maimon <jmaimon@ttec.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:01:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4C6943DF.4070702@ttec.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Joe -
Excellent question, and one which I know is getting
some public policy attention. There is a session at
upcoming Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in=20
Vilnius <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/index.php/component/chronocontact=
/?chronoformname=3DWSProposals2010View&wspid=3D158>
specifically covering some of these issues.
I also believe that some of the IETF sidr working group folks
have noted the need for local policy support so that ISPs can=20
decide to trust routes, even if not verifiable from their configured=20
Trust Anchor. This is probably an essential control for most
ISPs to have, even if never needed. =20
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Aug 16, 2010, at 9:57 AM, "Joe Maimon" <jmaimon@ttec.com> wrote:
> ...
>=20
> Kind of interesting to consider how a successful implementation of RPKI=20
> might change the rules of this game we all play in. I tried talking=20
> about that at ARIN in Toronto, not certain I was clear enough.
>=20
> Joe
