[128778] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arie Vayner)
Mon Aug 16 04:08:59 2010
In-Reply-To: <4C68DF61.6080601@tiedyenetworks.com>
From: Arie Vayner <ariev@vayner.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:08:31 +0300
To: Mike <mike-nanog@tiedyenetworks.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
For resolvers, I guess it would make sense to advertise them as /32s as
dynamic prefixes coming from some SLB device...
You can have multiple VIPs, each representing a different POP/network
domain...
Arie
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Mike <mike-nanog@tiedyenetworks.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am needing to renumber some core infrastructure - namely, my
> nameservers and my resolvers - and I was wondering if the collective wisdom
> still says heck yes keep this stuff all on seperate subnets away from
> eachother? Anyone got advice either way? Should I try to give sequential
> numbers to my resolvers for the benefit of consultants ... like .11, .22 and
> .33 for my server ips?
>
> Mike-
>
>
>
