[128746] in North American Network Operators' Group
Routers in Space (was: Lightly used IP addresses)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Eisenberg)
Sun Aug 15 14:02:46 2010
From: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan@atlasnetworks.us>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:02:32 +0000
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimR3n8Foog4uaQBwRXhXGQJTCrfKPMvTS5z_q4q@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> In other words, if the ARIN board adopts a policy that legacy
> registrants must install some of their addresses on a router on the
> moon (or perhaps some requirement that's a little less extreme) then
> failing to is cause for terminating the contract (14.b). Which revokes
> the IP addresses (14.e.i).
Why be less extreme? I would rather see moon-routers!
NANO's are encouraged to provide the datasheets for the Cisco 6509's solar-=
power module and wideband laser signaling SFPs.
Best Regards,
Nathan Eisenberg
