[128604] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Lightly used IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Kirch)
Fri Aug 13 14:02:39 2010
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:58:29 -0400
From: Andrew Kirch <trelane@trelane.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=xQq5L8hVgoZ30uYFyGvnDq5kS3N8tpnrZwyHA@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Jeff,
Go for it. I've always wondered what ARIN had between it's legs.
Andrew
On 8/13/2010 1:53 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> 9. I could point out so many cases of "justification abuse" or
> outright fraudulent justification and I bet nothing would actually
> transpire.
>
> My two cents.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Owen DeLong<owen@delong.com> wrote:
>> On Aug 13, 2010, at 10:36 AM, John Levine wrote:
>>
>>>> http://www.circleid.com/posts/psst_interested_in_some_lightly_used_ip_addresses/
>>>> Discuss. :-)
>>> I don't entirely understand the process. Here's the flow chart as far
>>> as I've figured it out:
>>>
>>> 1. A sells a /20 of IPv4 space to B for, say, $5,000
>>>
>>> 2. A tells ARIN to transfer the chunk to B
>>>
>>> 3. ARIN says no, B hasn't shown that they need it
>>>
>>> 4. A and B say screw it, and B announces the space anyway
>>>
>>> 5. ???
>>>
>>> R's,
>>> John
>> 6. ARIN receives a fraud/abuse complaint that A's space is being used by B.
>> 7. ARIN discovers that A is no longer using the space in accordance with their RSA
>> 8. ARIN reclaims the space and A and B are left to figure out who owes what to whom.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
