[128602] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Lightly used IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Galbraith)
Fri Aug 13 13:58:03 2010
In-Reply-To: <77CE0974-8CC1-4D83-8723-EF661A9D9BF0@delong.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:54:21 -0500
From: Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, rs@seastrom.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> 6. ARIN receives a fraud/abuse complaint that A's space is being used
> by B.
> 7. ARIN discovers that A is no longer using the space in accordance
> with their RSA
> 8. ARIN reclaims the space and A and B are left to figure out who owes
> what to whom.
>
>
So is there a fine line between "selling"/"renting" the space to B and
providing 1Mbit of bandwidth over a GRE tunnel to B and allowing them to
announce the space via any other transit provider? I'm just curious what the
difference is (besides a bit of technical work with the latter). It will be
interesting to see what happens as the last of the IPv4 space is exhausted.
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.492.0464
