[128513] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: net-neutrality
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Eisenberg)
Wed Aug 11 12:27:55 2010
From: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan@atlasnetworks.us>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:27:43 +0000
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008111050090.380@a84-22-97-10.cb3rob.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Hi, considering the fact that several organisations have been severely
> undermining net-neutrality over the past few months, which they seem to s=
ee
> as less important than their copyright bullshit, we have decided to set a=
n
> example:
>=20
> Should the following networks, to which list more will be added over the
> coming month, desire to exchange traffic with AS34109, they can obtain a
> traffic relay contract at sales@cb3rob.net, the costs of which amount to =
10000
> euros per month, excl. 19% VAT, if not, well, then it's simply no more in=
ternets
> for them... sorry peeps.
Just so I understand correctly, you're implementing what is tantamount to a=
'violation of net neutrality' in order to punish these organizations for a=
ttempting to protect their intellectual property?
You seem to value the neutral natural state of the internet at large. If y=
ou're upset by the way these businesses have conducted themselves, find a r=
esponse which doesn't violate your own ethics. Otherwise, you look like a =
hypocrite throwing a tantrum.
Best Regards,
Nathan Eisenberg
