[128493] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Google wants your Internet to be faster
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Aug 10 18:00:48 2010
To: Joseph Jackson <jjackson@aninetworks.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:42:43 PDT."
<6D497FE8AFD83E49AFADD9114C569F8F06B580ABA9@EXMBX10.exchhosting.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:00:06 -0400
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1281477606_4256P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:42:43 PDT, Joseph Jackson said:
> The way I understand it is if you aren't paying for preferred service then
> your VPN traffic would be at the bottom of the stack on forwarding. So while
> it gets around GeoIP stuff vpns would be subject to the same quality of service
> settings as any other traffic that isn't paying for a faster service.
This sounds suspiciously like Matt Blaze's observation:
"A commercial CA will protect you from anyone whose money it refuses to take".
As usual, it ends up as "follow the money".
--==_Exmh_1281477606_4256P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFMYcvmcC3lWbTT17ARAjkCAJ9DtO1OX96n0tvmG+Ftudid83VKoQCgla27
+i6tGJC08307vW79O4yLCrQ=
=bVvQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1281477606_4256P--
