[128491] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Google wants your Internet to be faster
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joly MacFie)
Tue Aug 10 17:53:36 2010
In-Reply-To: <4C61B783.3060606@mompl.net>
From: Joly MacFie <joly@punkcast.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:53:07 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Isn't the essence of consensus is to find common areas of agreement while
punting on the rest. There's plenty to focus on that IS in there, like
transparency and FCC control?
Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> That said, the actual, published document has some huge issues. It pays
>> excellent lip service to net neutrality, but it has simply HUGE
>> loopholes with lots of weasel words that could be used to get away with
>> most anything. for example, it expressly excludes and wireless network.
>>
>
>
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
Secretary - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
---------------------------------------------------------------
