[128459] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Google wants your Internet to be faster

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason Iannone)
Mon Aug 9 14:47:19 2010

In-Reply-To: <4C6047B2.9050107@inkworkswell.com>
From: Jason Iannone <jason.iannone@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:46:50 -0600
To: Reese <reese@inkworkswell.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2010/08/joint-policy-proposal-for-open-internet.html

Pretty boiler plate pro net neutral.  The transparency requirements
and 'differentiated services' exceptions are particularly interesting.

On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Reese <reese@inkworkswell.com> wrote:
> On 09 Aug 10 12:32 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>
>> * Graham Beneke:
>>
>>> On 09/08/2010 07:21, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I helped install my first Akamai cluster before year 2000 if I remember
>>>> correctly. So it's at least a decade ago :P
>>>
>>> What I find funny is that Google has already been running these kinds
>>> of content distribution nodes in Africa for over a year.
>>
>> They certainly have got infrastructure all over the globe.
>
> Hmmm. "If it plays in [insert name of locale in Africa]" will not have
> the same ring as "Peoria." For the older genset anyway. Maybe if it rhymes?
> Spoken to a musical backdrop? The current crop of youts will
> not hesitate once.
>
>> The Verizon is probably just a private peering agreement, and someone
>> misinterpreted that (or deliberately misrepresented it).
>
> Or it was supposed to be a secret. G was still denying any sort of
> agreement with V, last I heard.
>
> Reese
>
>
>
>
>
>


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post