[128455] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: off-topic: historical query concerning the Internet bubble

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Mon Aug 9 12:46:06 2010

X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:45:51 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTina+hT2pRox=_QNNy8xD6rfqYdxBC-yVhWFEJ5C@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On 09/08/2010 16:12, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> I think, from another list about 2 yrs ago, the person responsible for
> this data inside the company at the time (now not there) said someone
> misinterpreted his stats/numbers...

No doubt this is true.  And I note we haven't even started discussing 
whether this "doubling every N time periods" refers to bit-rate, bytes 
passed or daily max.

I would have said that most networks during that period had occasional 
burst growth rates of up to 100% within 100 days. The growth curve second 
derivative is usually much bumpier than the first derivative.  So, 
regardless of source, the quotation is a truism, an urban myth and 
ultimately means very little.

Nick


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post