[128400] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Proxy Server
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Raymond Macharia)
Thu Aug 5 15:52:30 2010
In-Reply-To: <D338D1613B32624285BB321A5CF3DB250FE54918CA@ginga.ai.net>
From: Raymond Macharia <rmacharia@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 22:51:54 +0300
To: Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>,
Joshua William Klubi <joshua.klubi@gmail.com>,
Greg Whynott <Greg.Whynott@oicr.on.ca>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
www.etinc.com. Built out of open source but you pay for a license fee but
not as steep as for an Allot unit. you can get the hardware or download the
software and pay for a key. Has the same functionalities that you are
looking for as an Allot box. I happen to have used both and I liked the
ETINC product. Stable and relaible.
Raymond Macharia
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net> wrote:
> ----
> >
> > I am fairly sure Squid has the concept of bandwidth pools which you can
> > apply via ACLs within the squid conf.
> > That may meet your proxy requirements but would not help with traffic
> > not being proxied.
> >
> > Squid will also allow you to define access to the inet based on ACLs
> > which can use various things to determine which policy will be applied
> > to the connection. eg, client src IP, client username, time of day,
> > regx...
> >
> > you may find it here:
> >
> > http://www.squid-cache.org/
> >
> ---
>
> Squid plus bandwidth management (ala dummynet or similar) could go a long
> way to addressing all of those functions.
>
> Deepak Jain
> AiNET
>
>
