[128380] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Thu Aug 5 08:59:15 2010
In-Reply-To: <61966.1281012596@localhost>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:58:48 -0400
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:49 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 08:04:47 EDT, William Herrin said:
>> If you feel that way, I suggest you take the issue up on the ARIN
>> public policy mailing list. Solicit public consensus for a change in
>> handling for SWIPs for "apartment complexes as ISP resellers." Absent
>> such a change, redacting identity and contact info for the apartment
>> management company remains simple fraud.
>
> I'm not at all convinced that mere redaction qualifies as fraud. It certa=
inly
> qualifies as *deceptive* - but does it rise to "fraudulent"? =A0 Is the f=
act that
> I use a Mail Boxes Etc-type service and don't accept mail at my home addr=
ess
> because it's a very physically insecure mailbox fraudulent? =A0Yes, it's =
somewhat
> deceptive, because it's not my actual home address. =A0But unless you str=
etch
> "deception for personal gain" to the point where "gain" is "I don't want =
mail
> stolen from my mailbox", I don't think it's actual fraud.
Valdis,
It takes some creative reading to think I claimed using an alternate
but still correct address (e.g. supplied by mailboxes etc.)
constituted fraud. Alternate !=3D redacted.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--=20
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com=A0 bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
