[128356] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Question of privacy with reassigned resources
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue Aug 3 21:48:13 2010
In-Reply-To: <4C58A8F4.9090307@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 21:48:02 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: todd glassey <tglassey@earthlink.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:40 PM, todd glassey <tglassey@earthlink.net> wrote=
:
> =A0On 8/3/2010 4:07 PM, ML wrote:
>> As an SP in the MDU (multi dwelling unit) market we dutifully SWIP
>> netblocks for each apartment complex/condo/etc. =A0Doing such we
>> publically publish the physical address an IP lives (sans Apt/Unit #).
>>
>> Would anyone feel this is too much information for people to know?
>> Should our SWIPs be more generic, local POP address or local corporate
>> office, just enough for rough geolocation accuracy?
>>
>> I realize what ARIN prefers, this is more of an opinion gathering.
>> -ML
>>
>>
>>
>>
> CALEA may come into play there meaning that there is no privacy per se.
calea !=3D ARIN policies... the above comment is a red-herring/fud.
reading the policies (roughly paraphrased) I'd say you need to
(depending where you line up with william's questions)
A swip the block the building uses (postal address probably fine) -
presumes +/29 to a building, of course
B swip as 'residential' anything larger than a /29 that lands at a
single dwelling being used for residential things
C swip as a normal record anything larger than a /29 that lands at a
single dwelling but considered a 'business'
as examples of these:
A - 1515 Connecticut Ave, Washington DC - The Regency Towers
Apartments (fictitious apartment building)
B - Private customer - Verizon Internet Services Inc. FTTP (Joe
Plumber Apartment #5 inside The Regency Towers Apartments)
C - Joes Plumbing and Handyman services - Apt #5 1515 Connecticut Ave
(the business address at that apartment location)
-chris
