[128269] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu Jul 29 10:45:23 2010
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100729202142.16e304c0@opy.nosense.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:42:58 -0700
To: Mark Smith <nanog@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jul 29, 2010, at 3:51 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 03:56:52 +1000
> Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au> wrote:
>=20
>> On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 10:42 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> You do have to properly set up the rules for which addresses to use =
for what
>>> communication properly. It breaks less if you forego the ULA =
brokenness,
>>> but, some people insist for whatever reason.
>>=20
>> What is "the ULA brokenness"?
>>=20
>=20
> If it is address selection policy distribution, then this Internet
> Draft is aiming to solve that -
>=20
> "Distributing Address Selection Policy using DHCPv6"
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fujisaki-6man-addr-select-opt-00.html
Source address selection is one of the problems.
Distribution of source address selection policy is part of that problem.
Owen
