[128216] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: I slogged through it so you don't have to -- ICANN Vertical
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joly MacFie)
Mon Jul 26 18:00:31 2010
In-Reply-To: <4C4DEB87.7040400@nic-naa.net>
From: Joly MacFie <joly@punkcast.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:00:03 -0400
To: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I found Milton Mueller's summary - noted at
http://www.isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=3D1006- useful.
Is there anything there that you would disagree with?
j
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams
<brunner@nic-naa.net> wrote:
> Actually the alliances visible at present are:
>
> JN2 proposal: Verisign, NeuStar, NetSol and eNom and others,
>
> RACK proposal: Afilas, PIR, GoDaddy, and others, including CORE.
>
> I look forward to your public comments, here or at the ICANN comment site=
.
>
> Eric
>
>
--=20
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie=A0 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
=A0http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
=A0 Secretary - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
---------------------------------------------------------------
