[128208] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv4 Exhaustion...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ricky Beam)
Mon Jul 26 16:30:22 2010
To: "Lee Howard" <lee@asgard.org>, nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:30:07 -0400
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <001c01cb2ab0$1cc40450$564c0cf0$@org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:43:39 -0400, Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org> wrote:
> RIAA should be IPv6 activists.
Right. That's not going to bite them on the ass either... privacy
addresses only stick around for ~72hrs. A demand for an address from 3
months back would be impossible to answer. (that would require L2 tracking
that an ISP simply cannot do.)
