[128177] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Sun Jul 25 21:33:43 2010
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <8B9FA608-FB8B-4152-97BC-7F8366E37DE8@virtualized.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:30:59 -0700
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jul 25, 2010, at 11:54 AM, David Conrad wrote:
> On Jul 25, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> My point was that as a cost center, IANA depends on funding from =
other sources. The RIRs are a major source of that funding.
>=20
> I guess it depends on your definition of "major". =46rom section 5.1 =
of ICANN's draft FY11 budget =
(http://www.icann.org/en/financials/proposed-opplan-budget-v1-fy11-17may10=
-en.pdf if you care):
>=20
> Registry $32,647,000=20
> Registrar $29,159,000=20
> RIR $823,000=20
> ccTLD $1,600,000=20
> IDN ccTLD $780,000=20
> Meeting Sponsorships $500,000
> Total $65,509,000
>=20
> So the RIRs contribute 1.25% of ICANN's budget.
>=20
> Regards,
> -drc
Correct, now, what portion of ICANN's budget is related to the NRO =
sector?
My bet is that it's less than 1.25%.
I suppose you can make domain owners pay for address administration if =
you want to make address administration free,
but, that seems a bit backwards to me.
Owen
