[128091] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Auer)
Sat Jul 24 13:58:16 2010
From: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <891EB3CD-5C88-491C-AE8E-F2A963A8637C@delong.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 03:56:52 +1000
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--=-B6JyUUZammKGw4rIBw2u
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 10:42 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> You do have to properly set up the rules for which addresses to use for w=
hat
> communication properly. It breaks less if you forego the ULA brokenness,
> but, some people insist for whatever reason.
What is "the ULA brokenness"?
Regards, K.
--=20
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer@biplane.com.au) +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/ +61-428-957160 (mob)
GPG fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B CD97 0156
Old fingerprint: 07F3 1DF9 9D45 8BCD 7DD5 00CE 4A44 6A03 F43A 7DEF
--=-B6JyUUZammKGw4rIBw2u
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAkxLKWQACgkQLrx1S82XAVYeBACgxf4OhPgZt/c+Ez9I+5C5sgsW
fJoAn2CAFuzO/ZRHAVsFNmB7+hIZTxe2
=lEv/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-B6JyUUZammKGw4rIBw2u--
