[128059] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IPv4 Exhaustion...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lee Howard)
Fri Jul 23 17:43:50 2010
From: "Lee Howard" <lee@asgard.org>
To: "'Positively Optimistic'" <positivelyoptimistic@gmail.com>,
<nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=NLxNdUK=NH3n_6SacDvk8Rn_i+pHzh=YJ0Jyb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:43:39 -0400
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
"Your subpoena is overly broad. Go back and specify port number and
timestamp. And read draft-ford-shared-addressing-issues-02, section
10."
RIAA should be IPv6 activists.
Lee
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Positively Optimistic [mailto:positivelyoptimistic@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 1:11 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: IPv4 Exhaustion...
>
> How do ISPs handle RIAA notices when NATTING customers.. ? We have
> several customers that don't require public address space that could be
> moved to private.. We're reluctant to make the move due to legal
> liabilities..
