[128048] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv4 Exhaustion...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Olsen)
Fri Jul 23 13:55:13 2010
From: "Nick Olsen" <nick@brevardwireless.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:54:20 -0400
Reply-To: nick@brevardwireless.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
We get them pretty often.
Always the same email with a different movie and IP. If its one of our
hotspots or "open" AP's. We just ignore it for the most part. If its a
res/commercial customer we contact them and let them know someone is
watching. Never has gone past the cookie cutter email we get from media
sentry.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(321) 205-1100 x106
----------------------------------------
From: "David E. Smith" <dave@mvn.net>
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 1:46 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv4 Exhaustion...
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:11, Positively Optimistic <
positivelyoptimistic@gmail.com> wrote:
> How do ISPs handle RIAA notices when NATTING customers.. ? We have
> several customers that don't require public address space that could be
> moved to private.. We're reluctant to make the move due to legal
> liabilities..
>
On a related note, what's the best way to handle RIAA/MPAA requests for
end-users that intentionally run "open" APs, especially when the notices
don't show up for days or weeks (by which time the offender, a hotel
guest,
has long since moved on)?
David Smith
MVN.net
