[128026] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marco Hogewoning)
Fri Jul 23 04:08:37 2010
From: Marco Hogewoning <marcoh@marcoh.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C48E461.9090002@matthew.at>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:07:56 +0200
To: matthew@matthew.at
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> "Home wifi router" vendors will do whatever it takes to make this =
work, so of course in your scenario they simply implement NAT66 (whether =
or not IETF folks think it is a good idea) however they see fit and =
nobody calls.
This will greatly help in deploying IPv6...here is another NAT because =
we said NATs would disappear.
MarcoH
