[127996] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Band)
Thu Jul 22 09:12:04 2010
From: Alex Band <alexb@ripe.net>
To: Antonio M. Moreiras <moreiras@nic.br>
In-Reply-To: <4C47BC3B.9020201@nic.br>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:11:42 +0200
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi Antonio,
That diagram looks interesting. We currently use slides with a bunch
of animation to explain to this concept, but it may be nice to have
something like this that people can keep as a printed version.
By the way, this is what we think two possible answers are: http://bit.ly/9V5GfU
There are more options, but these two are the most convenient weighing
all the up and downsides. Does anyone disagree?
Cheers,
Alex
On 22 Jul 2010, at 05:34, Antonio M. Moreiras wrote:
> I think it is a very well planned exercise. I would suggest you not to
> be straight in its execution. In some point, you could ask if the
> decisions would be the same in cases with different conditions: more
> pops, more users, less users, etc...
>
> We have a similar exercise in our training at NIC.br and we use this
> diagram to help the trainees understand the addresses:
> http://www.ipv6.br/pub/IPV6/MenuIPv6CursoPresencial/enderec-v6.pdf...
> Maybe it could be useful.
>
> Moreiras.
>
> Em 22/07/10 00:19, Mark Smith escreveu:
>>
>>> I'm curious to hear if you think it's clear and useful.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Alex Band
>>> RIPE NCC Trainer
>>>
>>> (Big props go to Marco Hogewoning @XS4ALL)
>
>
>
