[127915] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: While we worry about Vyatta and Bras.....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Jul 20 11:16:30 2010
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@americafree.tv>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:36:57 EDT."
<5D95BAEC-24F2-4CEB-9BF1-B43B3B78F365@americafree.tv>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:15:42 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1279638942_4630P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:36:57 EDT, Marshall Eubanks said:
> None of this is going to help configure any routers.
Most people call a network of routers run in isolation, without any care or
consideration of the outside world and its potential impact on operations, a
"test lab". The occasional injection of external reality is useful.
And I dunno - some of us may indeed configure our routers differently after
being reminded that we could get a letter from the FBI similar to the one that
Burstnet got. When was the last time you checked your routers to ensure that
they implemented the action your corporate policy dictates for receipt of such
a letter?
--==_Exmh_1279638942_4630P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFMRb2ecC3lWbTT17ARAnSkAKDRrbihgU5Ib7eCHBfUM34dKHYn5ACgiIVD
3z2so1N2j7/bf1IoN0pAf/U=
=6ay+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1279638942_4630P--
