[127901] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 30, Issue 50
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jim deleskie)
Mon Jul 19 19:44:22 2010
In-Reply-To: <F069971F-E4C2-4ED3-B3D1-7F4CA8FA79CE@egon.cc>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:44:07 -0300
From: jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com>
To: James Downs <egon@egon.cc>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This tread is starting to sound less and less operational, or maybe
I'm just old and jaded and its to out to care. You wonder if maybe
his legal dept or own moral views felt its wasn't worth the risk of
some joker doing something "BAD" with the info so that the FBI could
get involved.
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:31 PM, James Downs <egon@egon.cc> wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
>
>>> The single host/box had bomb making info and hit lists. =A0Yeah, I'd
>>> shut it down too if it was on my network.
>>>
>>> Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
>>
>> As would any reasonable operator.
>
> Or maybe it would have been better to not destroy a known source, and wor=
k
> with the FBI to maximize its value.
>
> Cutting it off like that was short-sighted and stupid.
>
> -j
>
>
