[127880] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: virtual switches
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Truman Boyes)
Sun Jul 18 21:10:01 2010
From: Truman Boyes <truman@suspicious.org>
In-Reply-To: <7AFBB29F-2CDB-40F7-86B1-E2CAF16DC7C5@oicr.on.ca>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:09:43 +1000
To: Greg Whynott <Greg.Whynott@oicr.on.ca>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 17/07/2010, at 2:18 AM, Greg Whynott wrote:
> Cisco has VSS (on 6500 class) and H3C has IRF; allowing you to =
virtualize 2 or more physical switches/routers in an active/active =
configuration where you can use all links and terminate LACP aggregates =
between the two devices. Is anyone using this or similar technology =
from another vendor? any recommendations or comments would be =
appreciated. thanks very much for your time!
>=20
> -g
Juniper also has Virtual Chassis support on the EX-series. The MX also =
supports active/active multi chassis-LAG. It works as you would expect, =
as you setup an ICCP link between the MX's.
Truman
