[1277] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Routing registry was Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Wed Dec 13 23:32:31 1995
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 23:16:36 -0500
To: Jeff.Ogden@um.cc.umich.edu
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso@cisco.com>
Cc: gcook@tigger.jvnc.net, cook@cookreport.com, bmanning@isi.edu,
jon@branch.com, dsiegel@rtd.com, dmbarton@mci.net, smd@sprint.net,
freedman@netaxs.com, rcollet@sprint.net, jim.payne@qm.sprintcorp.com,
nanog@merit.edu
I would think that, at this point, further discussions on Sprint
participation in IRR and/or RADB registries should be reserved
for Sprint comment, wouldn't you say?
- paul
At 10:42 PM 12/13/95 EST, Jeff.Ogden@um.cc.umich.edu wrote:
>MichNet's agreement is with MCI. I can't speak about deals others may have
>with Sprint. I think it is unlikely that Sprint got any Interregional
>Connectivity money, however. That money went to regional networks. Those
>networks may be spending some of the NSF funds with Sprint. The agreements
>that came from NSF along with the money imposed requirements on the
>regional networks and not directly on the NSPs. It is up to the
>regional networks to pass those requirements on to their NSP and I'd
>think it was up to the regional networks and not NSF to see that the NSPs
>follow the requirements.
>
>Sprint is a funny beast in this discussion because they are both
>an NSP and a NAP operator (and still the International Connections
>Manager?), but I think the recent discussion has been talking about
>NSPs and not NAP operators.
>
> -Jeff Ogden
> Merit
>
>
