[127693] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Rate Limiting on Cisco Router
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Kim)
Thu Jul 8 20:01:37 2010
From: Brandon Kim <brandon.kim@brandontek.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 20:01:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1007081341420.320@cust11794.lava.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
What about purchasing a low-end packetshaper to be used in between?
I know this doesn't answer the question but could it be an option?
> Date: Thu=2C 8 Jul 2010 13:43:17 -1000
> From: tony@lava.net
> To: Jay.Murphy@state.nm.us
> Subject: RE: Rate Limiting on Cisco Router
> CC: nanog@nanog.org
>=20
> On Thu=2C 8 Jul 2010=2C Murphy=2C Jay=2C DOH wrote:
>=20
> > Traffic shaping produces a queue=2C and does not completely junk a pack=
et.=20
> > It becomes q'd=2C and produces a smoother output.
>=20
> Traffic-shaping 80Mb/s of traffic is probably not a good idea for your=20
> router cpu :)
>=20
> Antonio Querubin
> 808-545-5282 x3003
> e-mail/xmpp: tony@lava.net
>=20
=
