[127620] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Question about Manycore processor- "Tilera"

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adrian Chadd)
Tue Jul 6 05:09:57 2010

Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:09:20 +0800
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: ?????? <yuan_zhihui@venustech.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <E187526496084D4CB1D600C33D0273C7@venus>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

There's been plenty of "multi-dimensional" processor interconnects over the
years. You should do some further research. :)


Adrian

(hypercube-connected O2000, anyone?)

On Tue, Jul 06, 2010, ?????? wrote:
> Hello, all.
> 
> I am not sure is it suitable or not that I ask this question here.
> 
> My question is about "Tilera", a new multi-core processor provider, however,
> they call themselves "Many-Core" to separate from RMI, Cavium, etc.
> 
> Tilera  claims that their processor have a 2D mesh so they can put more
> Cores(from 36,64 to 1K) in one Chip, while Cavium only with 1D bus, so
> Tilera think they have a much higher performance.
> 
> My question is: 
> 1 Is it true that Tilera revolutionarily improve the performance of
> multi-core(or Many-core) processor? 
> 2 If you make the choice between Tilera and Cavium, what do you prefer? Why?
> 
> Devin.
> 
> BTW, its website is  http://www.tilera.com/
> 
> 

-- 
- Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support -
- $24/pm+GST entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post