[127618] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Mikrotik & OC-3 Connection

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Bertrand)
Mon Jul 5 19:18:34 2010

Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:18:10 -0400
From: Steve Bertrand <steve@ipv6canada.com>
To: Jonathon Exley <Jonathon.Exley@kordia.co.nz>
In-Reply-To: <035FE016D625174BA7C7A9FA83E6C17985C1CAB3C1@winexmp02>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On 2010.07.05 17:26, Jonathon Exley wrote:
> In terms of FOSS routing platforms, I think Vyatta has a better user interface than Mikrotik.
> IMHO if the CLI is awkward then there a higher risk of misconfiguration.
> I haven't used either enough to comment about stability.

...not that I'd like to revert this to Mikrotic vs _vendor_, but *all*
Mikrotic-specific hardware that we have deployed has always accepted a
custom install of FreeBSD & Quagga, that boots directly from the same
type of media that the Mikrotic OS originally came on.

fwiw, the Quagga interface is very friendly to those who know Cisco.

Steve


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post