[127466] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Advice regarding Cisco/Juniper/HP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Colin Alston)
Wed Jun 30 02:28:06 2010
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikhzuQDP7-_LlFe7wYXCyy6pClE87Aiz6ce4eWq@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:27:15 +0200
From: Colin Alston <karnaugh@karnaugh.za.net>
To: Matthew Walster <matthew@walster.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Matthew Walster <matthew@walster.org> wrote:
> On 23 June 2010 08:54, Colin Alston <karnaugh@karnaugh.za.net> wrote:
>> I dislike HP switches from a management point of view (and I think the
>> VLAN config is nonsense), but they work fine.
>
> That's strange, I abhor the Cisco way of doing VLANs and love the
> HP/Procurve method.
>
> What do you find so irritating?
It just feels ass backwards alot of the time, especially trunking.
That's more likely an "RTFM" problem, but the Cisco VLAN config has
always just seemed more logical.
