[127385] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Advice regarding Cisco/Juniper/HP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ray Soucy)
Fri Jun 25 09:19:31 2010
In-Reply-To: <A92EAF652EC423438D55C14C60771C87026C825B@exchgsrv.nputilities.local>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:19:04 -0400
From: Ray Soucy <rps@maine.edu>
To: Jason Gurtz <jasongurtz@npumail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Poor choice of words, Juniper does fine.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Jason Gurtz <jasongurtz@npumail.com> wrote=
:
>> pretty quick. =A0I think what we do using about 10 people in a Cisco
>> environment would be closer to 20 in an HP and Juniper environment, so
>> those additional salaries and benefits need to be a factor.
>
> I hear you on the HP stuff, but are you saying that Juniper equipment als=
o
> shows a higher failure rate? =A0Or, are you saying they require a higher
> staffing rate for different reasons?
>
> Just wondering, since Juniper is trumpeting running the stock exchange an=
d
> all.
>
> ~JasonG
>
>
--=20
Ray Soucy
Epic Communications Specialist
Phone: +1 (207) 561-3526
Networkmaine, a Unit of the University of Maine System
http://www.networkmaine.net/
