[127347] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Recommendation in Australia for ISPs to force user security?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jens Link)
Tue Jun 22 18:50:46 2010

To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jens Link <lists@quux.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:50:17 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4C2107AA.1080707@bogus.com> (Joel Jaeggli's message of "Tue\,
	22 Jun 2010 11\:57\:46 -0700")
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> writes:

> not sure how they propose to enforce that, instrumentation approaches
> that look inside the home gateway have a non-trivial falsh positive rate
> and you've got a lot more hosts than ip addresses.

Well you force your users to install some software to control that you
have a current anti virus and a firewall in place. This software will
only run for certain versions of Windows and will have quite a lot of
CVE entrys. 

I will never get access to such a network. I don't use anti virus and I
don't have a firewall on my Laptop (by default I'm only running sshd and
if I need a (t)ftpd I start it manually).

Jens
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Foelderichstr. 40   | 13595 Berlin, Germany    | +49-151-18721264     |
| http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink@guug.de | -------------------  | 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post