[127326] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: List of a useful tools for network architects

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Tue Jun 22 00:53:07 2010

Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:52:37 -0700
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Pavel Dimow <paveldimow@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B4D5E38C-57F5-4A95-A0F0-229AC8459AB0@bogus.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org



On 06/21/2010 08:46 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> There was a lightning talk on Netdot at Nanog 48 I'd take a look at the presentation and the the website. It's quite useful from the documentation and discovery standpoint

meh, it was nanog 49, and the link is:

http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/presentations/Tuesday/Vicente-netdot-presentation-nanog49.pdf

https://netdot.uoregon.edu/trac/

> After the initial whit board I generally sit down and document what we're going to build then we build a transition plan the covers the activities based on the docs and move on from there. 
> 
> 
> Joel's iPad
> 
> On Jun 21, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Pavel Dimow <paveldimow@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> And how do you feel when client tell you that you don't have a
>> connection from SW-476 to SW-145?
>> "Well you see, there are plenty of boxes out there (couple hundreds)
>> you don't expect that everything must be perfect right? Anyhow I was
>> very tired that day...."
>>
>> The point is, I am not looking for a program that will design the
>> network instead of me, just a little sanity check.
>>
>> I agree that head, whiteboard, marker, sharp pencil :) are very
>> valuable but those were on my list anyway :)
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Jens Link <lists@quux.de> wrote:
>>> Pavel Dimow <paveldimow@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am wondering what tools you consider most valuable when designing big
>>>> network from scratch or perform a migration?
>>>
>>> White board and a digital camera to document the drawings. Pen and paper
>>> are also a very important tool.
>>>
>>>> For example I would like to know is there a tool that will perform
>>>> basic sanity checks like network equipment without redundant link or
>>>> without link at all...
>>>
>>> Well there is my head and a couple of years experience. ;-)
>>>
>>>> I know that the one who design a network have to consider all this
>>>> issues but some automatic check will save some time for sure...
>>>
>>> Discuss your design with others. There is always more than one way to
>>> design a network.
>>>
>>> Jens
>>> --
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> | Foelderichstr. 40   | 13595 Berlin, Germany    | +49-151-18721264     |
>>> | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink@guug.de | -------------------  |
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post