[126982] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Sheldon)
Wed Jun 9 11:21:35 2010
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:19:24 -0500
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20100609130933.GD1482697@hiwaay.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 6/9/2010 08:09, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Jorge Amodio <jmamodio@gmail.com> said:
>> That's why at least in the US by *regulation* you must have insurance
>> to be able to operate a car, instead of mitigating the safety issues
>> that represents a teenager texting while driving we deal with the
>> consequences.
>
> The insurance requirement is a state-by-state thing. It was only added
> here a few years ago, and I don't think it is universal.
Similar answer as the one for the brakes and tires thing.
Implementation may vary from state to state, just like the mechanical
standards thing. When last I lived in California, there was no
"insurance" requirement but there was a "proof of financial
responsibility" requirement that was most easily (for most people) by
carrying insurance to certain standards for Public Liability and
Property Damage.
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting
the vote.
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
