[126889] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brielle Bruns)
Tue Jun 8 17:15:30 2010

Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:15:13 -0600
From: Brielle Bruns <bruns@2mbit.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <001f01cb074e$cb548ab0$61fda010$@com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On 6/8/10 3:08 PM, Peter Boone wrote:
> So let's say a cyber-attack originates from Chinese script kiddie.
>
> Albania, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark,
> Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia,
> Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania,
> Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States
> will all respond by invading China? Is NATO trying to start a war here?
>
> There's no mention in the article about any kind of electronic response to
> the attack.
>


Of course, their reasoning seems to be that theres no possible way an 
attack could be from Russia, but using a open proxy, relay, etc in 
China.  Its not like an IP is guaranteed to be directly controlled by 
someone in that country.

So, we end up invading China, and while all of our troops are there, 
Russia comes in and takes over the US or the EU without much effort.

Note i'm just using Russia and China in examples here, no specific 
reason that it could only be them.

If I didn't know any better, I'd say they let Bush write their policies.
-- 
Brielle Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
http://www.sosdg.org    /     http://www.ahbl.org


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post