[126847] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Strange practices?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (deleskie@gmail.com)
Mon Jun 7 16:53:10 2010

To: "Dale Cornman" <bstymied@gmail.com>,nanog@nanog.org
From: deleskie@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 20:52:40 +0000
Reply-To: deleskie@gmail.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Should work fine.
------Original Message------
From: Dale Cornman
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Strange practices?
Sent: Jun 7, 2010 5:50 PM

Has anyone ever heard of a multi-homed enterprise not running bgp with
either of 2 providers, but instead, each provider statically routes a block
to their common customer and also each originates this block in BGP?   One
of the ISP's in this case owns the block and has even provided a letter of
authorization to the other, allowing them to announce it in BGP as well.
  I had personally never heard of this and am curious if this is a common
practice as well as if this would potentially create any problems by 2
Autonomous Systems both originating the same prefix.

Thanks

-Bill


Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post