[126649] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Quick IP6/BGP question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Abley)
Wed May 26 14:54:01 2010
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4BFBEF54.7040601@airwire.ie>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 20:53:41 +0200
To: Martin List-Petersen <martin@airwire.ie>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jabley@hopcount.ca
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2010-05-25, at 17:40, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
> On 24/05/10 19:21, Thomas Magill wrote:
>>> =46rom the provider side, are most of you who are implementing IP6
>> peerings running BGP over IP4 and just using IP6 address families to
>> exchange routes or doing IP6 peering?
>=20
> Most Internet Exchanges do not allow to mix on the same transport. So
> IPv4 peering over IPv4 transport, IPv6 peering over IPv6 transport, =
you
> can use the same interface though.
Most Internet Exchanges don't care what BGP protocol options consenting =
neighbours decide to use, in my experience. (If they cared, what could =
they do?)
Joe=
