[126522] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Partial Use Of one Regions IP Block in another
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Beavis)
Thu May 20 08:56:59 2010
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilpn8-tsOZTaa3WrjSWY_Z2L9QGFktfZ9a4BC68@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 06:56:25 -0600
From: Beavis <pfunix@gmail.com>
To: funkyfun@gmail.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
From my experience with the provider I have, when I try to acquire
IP space to let's say on the RIPE side (Im on the LACNIC side) for
reasons like greater visibility (some how). I believe that RIPE
requires me to have a company registered on the EMEA side or have my
provider place it for me. but i guess when i disengage with that
provider, I may need to give back the IP space they have provided me.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Net <funkyfun@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Are there any policies set by internet registries and/or transit
> providers today that prohibits organizations from using a Partially
> used IP Block allocated in one region say AP through APNIC to be
> comissioned and Propagated in another region such as EMEA serviced by
> RIPE?.
>
> Obv, the best approach would be to acquire a new Block in the 2nd
> region through its own registry, but sometimes due to strict
> prvisioning timelines, legal delays in getting the necessary approvals
> involved etc make this option less attractive. From an IPV4 space
> depletion perspective as well, it might be feasible if organizations
> having a large block in one region could split it amongst multiple
> regions to prevent Wastage.
>
> Any thoughts/expereinces and feedback would be appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
>
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
