[126285] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Danny McPherson)
Mon May 10 18:48:43 2010
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <547278A6-15D7-4CC0-A043-17E8288401B6@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:42:38 -0600
To: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On May 10, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Anton Kapela wrote:
> Interestingly, the article misses interception and other non-outage =
potentials due to (sub) prefix hijacking.=20
I think it captures it in such a way that my grandmother might be
more likely to grok it. Regardless, those are just more symptoms=20
of the same underlying problem, no? And the "i root" incident was
plausibly a hybrid of error and intercept, so there's a nice hefty=20
gray area there as well.=20
I suspect no one missed that.. =20
-danny=20=
