[126193] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DNS performance...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard Barnes)
Wed May 5 10:55:47 2010
In-Reply-To: <w2m88ac5c711005050748p3734bb02hb8022b0c1cde201@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 16:52:15 +0200
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
... and here's the direct link to the full report:
<https://www.dns-oarc.net/files/rzaia/rzaia_report.pdf>
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com> w=
rote:
> OARC did a performance study of a few name servers in the context of
> root zone scaling, but it should be generalizable:
> <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-59/presentations/wessels-root-zon=
e.pdf>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> There are a large number of DNS servers available. See for example
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_DNS_server_software
>>
>> Does anyone know of good performance comparisons, especially for high
>> end applications with lots of data/zones and/or high query/update
>> rates?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Donald
>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> =A0Donald E. Eastlake 3rd =A0 +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>> =A0155 Beaver Street
>> =A0Milford, MA 01757 USA
>> =A0d3e3e3@gmail.com
>>
>>
>
