[126128] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Sun May 2 04:51:46 2010
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: Steve Bertrand <steve@ipv6canada.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BDCA033.8030303@ipv6canada.com>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 09:50:59 +0100
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1 May 2010, at 22:42, Steve Bertrand <steve@ipv6canada.com> wrote:
> On 2010.05.01 16:43, ML wrote:
>> Has anyone here heard of or do they themselves charge extra for
>> providing a complete internet table to customers?
>
> ... I've never heard of it, but iow, I'd pay more if I could get my
> upstreams to provide the full table...
I've seen the opposite-namely getting a substantial discount for
moving from a default route feed to a dfz bgp feed. The rationale was
that the default route ip connection was provisioned using hsrp on the
provider side and came with a much stricter sla.
Nick
