[126126] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Surcharge for providing Internet routes?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex H. Ryu)
Sat May 1 21:25:10 2010
Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 20:24:27 -0500
From: "Alex H. Ryu" <r.hyunseog@ieee.org>
To: ML <ml@kenweb.org>
In-Reply-To: <4BDC9281.50509@kenweb.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Do you mean "Full routes" for BGP ?
Sometimes there are extra charge for BGP, but never heard about full
routes or not.
How can they guarantee whether they provide Full routes or not ?
If some routes are missing, are they going to provide the credit for it ?
Full routes from BGP is always best-effort basis.
So I don't think they can charge it based on whether it is full routes
or not.
They may charge for running BGP with you, but not for full routes or not.
Alex
ML wrote:
> Has anyone here heard of or do they themselves charge extra for
> providing a complete internet table to customers?
>
> Waive the surcharge for sufficiently large commits?
>
>
>
>
